So I actually talked about this long ago on here, and it’s something that always interested me.Isn't the GR Corolla more of a direct descendent of the AE86 than the GR86? Toyota marketing is so interesting. The GR branding, and this....Not being critical....just interesting to me....
It wasn’t called AE86, it’s name was the Corolla Levin/GTS or Sprinter Trueno.I believe the GRC is more unique. Of course it has direct Corolla lineage since it uses a Corolla chassis, but it is more of a newer Celica GT-Four than anything.
Let's look at the facts:
AE86 - came in coupe or hatch, RWD, lightweight/barebones car, with N/A short stroke and high revving engine with Yamaha design (4A-GE)
FR-S/86/GR86 - coupe only, RWD, lightweight, N/A high revving, square engine - This car's development from the beginning was, fun lightweight rwd sports car and incorporated into its design was a callback or say fan service to the AE86.
Celica GT-Four - hatch, awd, turbo engine with strong internals capable of holding high hp comparable to its size - Created to compete in WRC
GRC - hatch, AWD, turbo engine ( possibly also strong internals capable of holding hp comparable to its size) - Beginning with the GRY was built to compete in WRC
Duh it's not a Celica, which is why I said the GRC is unique.It can’t be a new Celica when it’s a Corolla and the Corolla has its own history too. The Yaris would be a Spiritual successor to the Celica.
that’s like the Civic Type R wasn’t originally a 4 door, turbo 4 car but evolved into it. Same thing with the 210.
Well that's actually the same thing that happened with the AE86 🤣Duh it's not a Celica, which is why I said the GRC is unique.
If you want to be precise, of course it's not a Celica and of course it's a Corolla, that's the name it's going to come with.
But to say they had Corolla in mind at all when they designed the GRY, would be silly.
This is simply the chassis it ended up in. It wouldn't make sense to bring over the actual GRY when it likely would've cost a ton of money to make it meet US safety standards, plus the fact that a 2-door wouldn't sell as well as a 4-door.
The GRC shares nothing powertrain-wise with the car it shares a nameplate with.
The Civic Type R at least shares the fact that it uses a K-series engine like past Civic Si and Type Rs.
The 86 design was a call back to what the AE86 was, a lightweight, RWD, high-revving N/A car.
Civic - That's because the K series wasn't out yet. But once it was out, it has been used in the Si or Type R.Well that's actually the same thing that happened with the AE86 🤣
The GR Corolla even borrows the awd system from the Yaris like the WRC Corolla borrowing the Celica's awd system
The 86 is a great car but doesn't share any relation to the old car. Remember the old car wasn't called a "AE86" it was a Corolla Levin/GTS/Sprinter Trueno.
The CTR actually doesn't share the same engine as the first CTR (It had a B series) but its still a Civic, the GR Corolla is a Corolla. lol.
Actually the FRS/GT86 was inspired by 3 cars, 2000gt styling, Sports 800 boxer engine, AE86 chassis affordability and drive layout. After Scion died they tried to just capitalize on the AE86 portion. Thats just marketing, that's also why they say it's the "Spiritual Successor."Civic - That's because the K series wasn't out yet! But once it was out, it has been used in the Si or Type R.
86 - Since the beginning, both Akio Toyoda and Tetsuya Tada have said that the new 86 was inspired by the AE86.
When the CEO and chief engineer have said it from the beginning, it's seems like more than just marketing. You said it only started when "Scion died". Scion (U.S./Canada only) ended in 2016 whereas the car is called GT86/86 in other countries since 2012 and been called FT86 since internal development started.Actually the FRS/GT86 was inspired by 3 cars, 2000gt styling, Sports 800 boxer engine, AE86 chassis affordability and drive layout. After Scion died they tried to just capitalize on the AE86 portion. Thats just marketing.
I understand that but it is marketing. Like I said originally, I'm not denying its the "Spiritual successor" to the AE86 chassis, its just not the successor. It's inspired by, but is not the line successor. In the same way Toyota said the GR Yaris is the "Spiritual Successor" to the GT-Four Celica.When the CEO and chief engineer have said it from the beginning, it's seems like more than just marketing. You said it only started when "Scion died". Scion (U.S./Canada only) ended in 2016 whereas the car is called GT86/86 in other countries since 2012 and been called FT86 since internal development started.
I think we both agree, it's the spiritual successor, not the actual lineage. Wasn't trying to sound disagreeable.I understand that but it is marketing. Like I said originally, I'm not denying its the "Spiritual successor" to the AE86 chassis, its just not the successor. It's inspired by, but is not the line successor. In the same way Toyota said the GR Yaris is the "Spiritual Successor" to the GT-Four Celica.
I apologize if I came off strong as well, I actually owned a FRS and love the platform.I think we both agree, it's the spiritual successor, not the actual lineage. Wasn't trying to sound disagreeable.
But my take, maybe I didn't explain as much, is that the whole "spiritual successor" thing means a lot with both the GR86 and GRC/GRY. Especially with the enthusiasts and people who actually buy the cars, if I was the same age/place in my life in the mid-80s- early-90s, I would have bought an AE86 as I would buy a Celica GT-Four, just like I bought an FR-S/ would buy a GR86 or GR Corolla.
The AE line became FWD and AWD like the Celica. So technically the E210 is the line successor. Succeeds the AE111 and E120 XRS.Really? AWD vs RWD?
This is actually a very interesting topic because your suspicions are valid. I use to have these conversations in AE86 groups and with Guff.Such a great conversation. Thank you. Love the passion!
+1I believe the GRC is more unique. Of course it has direct Corolla lineage since it uses a Corolla chassis, but it is more of a newer Celica GT-Four than anything.
Let's look at the facts:
AE86 - came in coupe or hatch, RWD, lightweight/barebones car, with N/A short stroke and high revving engine with Yamaha design (4A-GE)
FR-S/86/GR86 - coupe only, RWD, lightweight, N/A high revving, square engine - This car's development from the beginning was, fun lightweight rwd sports car and incorporated into its design was a callback or say fan service to the AE86.
Celica GT-Four - hatch, awd, turbo engine with strong internals capable of holding high hp comparable to its size - Created to compete in WRC
GRC - hatch, AWD, turbo engine ( possibly also strong internals capable of holding hp comparable to its size) - Beginning with the GRY was built to compete in WRC
Those rumors were more from enthusiasts after Toyota trademarked the Celica name though. Which the Celica always was a sports car/GT car. Toyota did say the Yaris is the spiritual successor though, not the Corolla. (3 door rally car)+1
Spec wise, the GRC is more of a successor to the Celica GT-Four but from a model name, the GR Corolla is successor to the Corolla GT-S (AE86). IMO, it was just the timing from when Toyota announced the Toyota 86 as the successor to the Corolla GT-S based on some of the ingredients of the 86 in similarity to the GT-S; NA engine, 2+2, RWD.
The GRC has taken lineage of both the Corolla name, combined it with the Celica GT-Four specs and bundled it into one. A lot rumors flooded about the return of a Toyota Celica and here we are essentially witnessing it now.